spacer image
Research in Industrial-Organizational Psychology
Back to the HomePage                Research Reports in Consumer Behavior Psychology HomeCSU Home

Consumer-Industrial Research Program
View research conducted by CSU faculty/students:
Attitudes at Work
Cross-Culture Issues
Discrimination in the Workplace
Diversity in the Workplace
Job Descriptions / Job Analysis
Motivation / Goal-Setting
Performance Appraisal
Personality in the Workplace
Recruitment and Selection
Research Methods / Measurement Issues
Retaliation for Unfair Events
Training
Mailing Address
Cleveland State University
College of Science
Psychology Dept
2121 Euclid Avenue
CB 168
Cleveland, OH 44115-2214
 
Campus Location
Chester Building 158
2300 Chester Ave. 
Phone: 216.687.2574

Content Contact
Dr. Michael Horvath


Research Methods / Measurement Issues

Meta-analysis

  • Published in 2007 in the Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration
  • Author: C. C. Bowen
  • For more information, contact: C. C. Bowen

Content Analysis

  • Published in 2007 in the Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration
  • Authors: C. C. Bowen and W. M. Bowen
  • For more information, contact: C. C. Bowen

Normative Versus Ipsative measurement

  • Published in 2007 in the Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Author: C. C. Bowen
  • For more information, contact: C. C. Bowen

Online Surveys in Participant Pools: Implications for Students, Researchers, and Participant Pool Managers

    • Published in 2006 in Teaching of Psychology
    • Authors: M. Horvath, C. L. S. Pury, and J. Johnson
    • For more information, contact: Mike Horvath

Abstract: The advent of Web-based participant pool management software enhances the ability of psychology researchers to conduct online surveys. However, without careful implementation, online surveys, when they are in competition with studies requiring more effort, have the potential to threaten participants' rights to a debriefing, external validity of participant pool research, and equitable researcher access to participants. We outline these threats, present an illustrative example, and discuss our use of 1 potential solution to all 3 problems: the in-person education session.